Asbestos Exposure for Contractors
December 7, 2016 Leave a comment
A Forum on Key Legal Issues for Design Professionals, Contractors, and Developers
December 7, 2016 Leave a comment
The California Supreme Court has ruled that premises owners and employers owed a duty to the employee’s household to prevent take-home exposure to asbestos. For example, claims that the plaintiff was exposed when a family member came home with asbestos fibers on his work clothes. For a more detailed description of the case, click here.
This ruling is more important to the Construction industry given the ruling in Hernandezcueva v. Brady 243 Cal.App.4th 249 from January of this year. In Hernandezcueva, the court found that E.F. Brady was potentially liable for its use of an asbestos-containing drywall joint compound on the job. The Court held that E.F. Brady was not just a contractor, but played a significant role in the stream of commerce of the asbestos-containing joint compound because it:
A more through discussion of that case can be found here.